News

UK court rules on moving migrants to Rwanda

A positive verdict was handed down in eight individual cases, but challenges to the policy as a whole were dismissedUK court rules on moving migrants to Rwanda

UK court rules on moving migrants to Rwanda

UK Border Force assists small boat in crossing the English Channel ©  Getty Images / Andrew Aitchison

The UK’s plan to deport illegal immigrants to Rwanda is “lawful,” the British high court ruled on Monday, dismissing a challenge to the policy from a handful of asylum seekers, several migrants’-rights NGOs, and a border officials’ union. 

However, two judges declared the government had failed to take into account the individual circumstances of eight asylum-seekers it had tried to deport on the scheme’s aborted first flight in June.

It is lawful for the government to make arrangements for relocating asylum seekers to Rwanda and for their asylum claims to be determined in Rwanda rather than in the United Kingdom,” Lord Justice Lewis said in the court’s decision, qualifying that the government must also weigh whether “anything about each person’s particular circumstances” might preclude relocation to the central African nation. 

European court blocks UK deportation flight

European court blocks UK deportation flight

Read more European court blocks UK deportation flight

Under the terms of the agreement, Rwanda would process the asylum claims of individuals illegally arriving in the UK and host those whose applications are approved. Home Secretary Suella Braverman explained the policy was meant to discourage migrants from making the dangerous crossing, adding the government ultimately hopes to make similar deals with other countries to reroute all illegal immigrants elsewhere.

She has called the 40,000-plus migrants crossing the English Channel this year an “invasion” and vowed to ban anyone who “jumps the queue” in this way from remaining in the UK.

The UK and Rwanda inked the £140 million migration deal in April, though the first scheduled deportation flight carrying eight migrants was postponed as the plane waited to take off in June, with the European Court for Human Rights insisting the policy involved “a real risk of irreversible harm.” 

The groups who challenged the policy are expected to appeal Monday’s decision. “Treating people who are in search of safety like human cargo and shipping them off to another country is a cruel policy that will cause great human suffering,” Ever Solomon, head of the Refugee Council, said in a statement on Monday. Opponents of the policy have cited Rwanda’s poor human rights record, including the infamous 1994 genocide that saw 800,000 people slaughtered.

Source

Leave a Reply

Back to top button