Russia & FSU

Russian experts issue collective rebuke to call for preemptive nuclear strike

The consequences of the nuclear war between Moscow and the West will be catastrophic, they said.Russian experts issue collective rebuke to call for preemptive nuclear strike

Russian experts issue collective rebuke to call for preemptive nuclear strike

Illustration ©  Alexander Antropov / Pixabay

It is extremely irresponsible and dangerous to call on Russia to carry out a preemptive nuclear strike in order to gain an upper hand in its current standoff with the West over Ukraine, more than 20 experts from Russia’s influential think tank have warned. 

The joint statement released by a group of members of the Council for Foreign and Defense Policy on Thursday is one of the recent responses to the debate within the Russian expert community about the use of nuclear weapons, which was prompted by a controversial op-ed written last month by Sergey Karaganov, an honorary member of the council’s presidium. Karaganov has made a case for Moscow lowering the threshold for the first use of its nuclear arsenal, arguing that, at some point, it should consider striking targets in Europe. 

Without mentioning Karaganov by name, a group of fellow think tank members said that they “unequivocally condemn” such reasoning. “It is beyond irresponsible to assume that one can manage a limited nuclear conflict and stop it from spiraling into a global nuclear war,” they warned, adding that, under such a scenario, “tens and perhaps even millions” of lives would be at stake. “It is a direct threat to humanity as a whole,” the statement said.

The think tank, also known under its Russian acronym SVOP, is the co-founder of the Valdai Discussion Club, whose annual sessions President Vladimir Putin attends.

Eric Zuesse: Amid talk of a preemptive nuclear strike on NATO from Russia, why doesn't Moscow try this instead?

Eric Zuesse: Amid talk of a preemptive nuclear strike on NATO from Russia, why doesn't Moscow try this instead?

Read more Eric Zuesse: Amid talk of a preemptive nuclear strike on NATO from Russia, why doesn’t Moscow try this instead?

Karaganov’s approach was previously criticized by other noted experts, including Fyodor Lukyanov, chairman of SVOP’s presidium and editor-in-chief of Russia in Global Affairs magazine, who argued that the damage from “the game of nuclear peek-a-boo is a gamble” would be “multiples worse than any hypothetical benefits.”

Putin said last month that Moscow would resort to nuclear weapons only when faced with an existential threat.

According to Russia’s Nuclear Doctrine, revised in 2020, the country reserves the right to use its nuclear arsenal if it comes under attack with nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction. It may also use the nuclear option when attacked with conventional means, but only if “the existence of the state as a whole comes under threat.”

Source

Leave a Reply

Back to top button